Audria vs Fathom (2026)
Last updated July 18, 2026
Audria is the agentic AI notetaker for on-site teams: it turns office conversations into completed actions in your tools, understands every person on your team, and gives Claude and ChatGPT the context of everything discussed. Here is how that compares with Fathom.
Fathom is a well-liked, generously free notetaker for video meetings: a bot joins the call and you get a clean summary after. Audria is not a meeting tool. It is an ambient layer for the office itself, and its output is not a summary but the follow-up work, drafted and waiting for your confirmation.
Audria vs Fathom, side by side
| At the office | Audria | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| On all day, ambient, no start button per conversation | Yes, one switch for the whole office day | No, per scheduled meeting |
| Captures off-calendar conversations | Yes: desk-side, hallway, whiteboard | No |
| Works without a meeting bot | Yes, never joins your calls | No, a bot joins the call |
| Voices become real people | Yes, linked to Slack, Jira, and email identities | No |
| Ledger of what you owe people and what they owe you | Yes, per person | No |
| Output | Ready-to-review drafts in Gmail, Slack, Jira, Linear | Summaries |
| Context handed to Claude and ChatGPT | Built in, no copy paste | Copy and export |
Which should you pick?
Choose Fathom if you want a capable free notetaker for scheduled video calls. Choose Audria if your team shares a room and the follow-ups are what keep slipping.
Comparisons reflect publicly available product information as of July 2026. If we got something wrong, tell us and we will fix it.
Learn more
- The full comparison across notetakers and hardware recorders
- What is Audria?
- Try Audria free on iPhone